HAPPENED TO SAUL?
Chapter
43
|
O |
ne of the most influential testimonies to
Christianity was when Saul of Tarsus, perhaps Christianity's most rabid
antagonist, became the apostle Paul. Saul was a Hebrew zealot, a religious
leader. Being born in Tarsus gave him the opportunity to be exposed to the most
advanced learning of his day. Tarsus was a university city known for its stoic
philosophers and culture. Strabo, the Greek geographer, praised Tarsus for
being so interested in education and philosophy. 10/17:469
Paul, like his father, possessed Roman citizenship,
a high privilege. He seemed to be well versed in Hellenistic culture and
thought. He had great command of the Greek language and displayed dialectic
skill. He quoted from less familiar poets and philosophers:
For
in him we live and move and exist [Epimenides], as even some of your own poets
have said, "For we also are His offspring" [Aratus, Cleanthes] (Acts
17:28). Do not be deceived: "Bad company corrupts good morals"
[Menander] (1 Corinthians 15:33). One of themselves, a prophet of their own,
said, "Cretans are always liars, evil beasts, lazy gluttons"
[Epimenides] (Titus 1:12).
Paul's education was Jewish and took place under the strict doctrines of the
Pharisees. At about age fourteen, he was sent to study under Gamaliel, one of the great rabbis of the time, the grandson of Hillel.
Paul asserted that he was not only a Pharisee but also the son of Pharisees (Acts 23:6). He could
boast: "I was advancing in Judaism beyond many of my contemporaries among my countrymen, being more extremely
zealous for my ancestral traditions" (Galatians 1:14).
If one is to understand Paul's
conversion, it is necessary to see why he was so vehemently anti-Christian: The
reason was his devotion to the Jewish law. That devotion triggered his adamant
discontent with Christ and the early church.
Paul's "offence with the Christian message was
not," as Jacques Dupont writes:
With the affirmation of Jesus' messiahship [but] ... with the attributing to Jesus of a saving role which robbed the law of all its value in the purpose of salvation ... [Paul was] violently hostile to the Christian faith because of the importance which he attached to the law as a way of salvation.
So Paul
began his pursuit to death of "the sect
of the Nazarenes" (Acts 26:9-11). He literally
"laid waste the church" (Acts 8:3). He set out for Damascus with
documents authorizing him to seize the followers of Jesus
and bring them back to face trial.
Then something happened to Paul.
And it came about
that as he journeyed, he was approaching Damascus, and suddenly a light from
heaven flashed around him; and he fell to the ground, and heard a voice saying
to him, "Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting Me?" And he said,
"Who art Thou, Lord?" And He said, "I am Jesus whom you are
persecuting, but rise, and enter the city, and it shall be told you what you
must do." And the men who traveled with him stood speechless, hearing the
voice, but seeing no one. And Saul got up from the ground, and though his eyes
were open, he could see nothing; and leading him by the hand, they brought him
into Damascus. And he was three days without sight, and neither ate nor drank.
Now there was a
certain disciple at Damascus, named Ananias; and the Lord said to him in a
vision, "Ananias." And he said, "Behold, here am 1, Lord."
And the Lord said to him "Arise and go to the street called Straight, and
inquire at the house of Judas for a man from Tarsus named Saul, for behold, he
is praying, and he has seen in a vision a man named Ananias come in and lay his
hands on him, so that he might regain his sight" (Acts 9:1-12).
At this point one can see why the Christians feared
Paul. Ananias answered:
"Lord, I have heard from many about this man, how much harm he did to Thy saints at Jerusalem; and here he has authority from the chief priests to bind all who call upon Thy name." But the Lord said to him, "Go, for he is a chosen instrument of Mine, to bear My name before the Gentiles and kings and the sons of Israel; for I will show him how much he must suffer for My name's sake." And Ananias departed and entered the house, and after laying his hands on him said, "Brother Saul, the Lord Jesus, who appeared to you on the road by which you were coming, has sent me so that you may regain your sight, and be filled with the Holy Spirit." And immediately there fell from his eyes something like scales, and he regained his sight, and he arose and was baptized; and he took food and was strengthened (Acts 9:13-19a).
Paul said, "Have I not seen Jesus our
Lord?" (1 Corinthians 9:1). He compared Christ's appearance to him with
Christ's postresurrection appearances among the apostles. "And last of all
... He appeared to me also" (1 Corinthians 15:8).
Notice that Paul's encounter with Jesus and
subsequent conversion were sudden and unexpected. "A very bright light
suddenly flashed from heaven all around me" (Acts 22:6). Paul had no idea
who this heavenly person could be. The announcement that it was Jesus of
Nazareth left him trembling and astonished.
We might not know all the details, chronology, or
psychology of what happened to Paul on the road to Damascus but we do know
this: It radically affected every area of his life.
First, Paul's character was drastically
transformed. The Encyclopedia Britannica describes
him before his conversion as an intolerant, bitter, persecuting, religious
bigot -proud and temperamental. After his conversion he is pictured as patient,
kind, enduring and self-sacrificing.
Second, Paul's relationship with the
followers of Jesus was transformed. "Now for several days he was with the
disciples who were at Damascus" (Acts 9:19). And when Paul went to the
apostles, he received the "right hand of fellowship."
Third, Paul's message was
transformed. Though he still loved his Jewish heritage, he had changed from a
bitter antagonist to a determined protagonist of the Christian faith.
"Immediately he began to proclaim Jesus in the synagogues, saying, 'He is
the Son of God' " (Acts 9:20). Paul's intellectual convictions had
changed. His experience compelled him to acknowledge that Jesus was the
Messiah, in direct conflict with the Pharisees' messianic ideas. His new
concept of Christ meant a total revolution in his thought.
Jacques Dupont acutely observes that after Paul
"had passionately denied that a crucified man could be the Messiah, he
came to grant that Jesus was indeed the Messiah, and, as a consequence,
rethought all his messianic ideas."
Also he could now understand
that Christ's death on the cross, which appeared to be a curse of God and a
deplorable ending of someone's life, was actually God, through Christ,
reconciling the world to himself. Paul came to understand that, through the
crucifixion, Christ became a curse for us (Galatians 3:13) and was "made
... to be sin on our behalf' (2 Corinthians 5:21). Instead of a defeat, the
death of Christ was a great victory, being capped by the resurrection. The
cross was no longer a "stumbling block" but the essence of God's
messianic redemption. Paul's missionary preaching can be summarized as
"explaining and giving evidence that the Christ had to suffer and rise
again from the dead . . . 'This Jesus whom I am proclaiming to you is the
Christ,' " he said (Acts 17:30).
Fourth, Paul's
mission was
transformed. He was changed from a Gentile-hater to a missionary to Gentiles.
He was changed from a Jewish zealot to an evangelist to Gentiles. As a Jew and
Pharisee, Paul looked down upon the despised Gentile as someone inferior to
God's chosen people. The Damascus experience changed him into a dedicated
apostle, with his life's mission aimed toward helping the Gentile. Paul saw in
the Christ who appeared to him the Savior for all people. Paul went from being
an orthodox Pharisee whose mission was to preserve strict Judaism to being a
propagator of that new radical sect called Christianity which he had so
violently opposed. There was such a change in him that "all those hearing
him continued to be amazed, and were saying, 'Is this not he who in Jerusalem
destroyed those who called on this [Jesus'] name, and who had come here for the
purpose of bringing them bound before the chief priests?' " (Acts 9:21).
Historian Philip Schaff states:
The conversion of Paul marks not only a
turning-point in his personal history, but also an important epoch in the
history of the apostolic church, and consequently in the history of mankind. It
was the most fruitful event since the miracle of Pentecost, and secured the
universal victory of Christianity.
During lunch at the University of Houston, I sat
down next to a student. As we discussed Christianity he made the statement that
there wasn't any historical evidence for Christianity or Christ. He was a
history major and I noticed that one of his books was a Roman history textbook.
He acknowledged that there was a chapter dealing with the apostle Paul and
Christianity. After reading the chapter, the student found it interesting that
the section on Paul started by describing the life of Saul of Tarsus and ended
with a description of the life of the apostle Paul. In the next to the last
paragraph the book observed that what happened in between was not clear. After
I turned to the book of Acts and explained Christ's post- resurrection
appearance to Paul, this student saw that it was the most logical explanation
of Paul's conversion. Later he also trusted Christ as his Savior.
Elias Andrews comments:
Many have found in the radical
transformation of this "Pharisee of the Pharisees" the most
convincing evidence of the truth and the power of the religion to which he was
converted, as well as the ultimate worth and place of the Person of Christ.
Archibald MacBride, professor at the University of
Aberdeen, writes of Paul: "Beside his achievements ... the achievements of
Alexander and Napoleon pale into insignificance." 5/10:516 Clement says
that Paul "bore chains seven times; preached the gospel in the East and
West; came to the
limit of the West; and died a martyr under
the rulers." 31/I:340
Paul stated again and again that the living,
resurrected Jesus had transformed his life. He was so convinced of Christ's
resurrection from the dead that he, too, died a martyr's death for his beliefs.
Two professors at Oxford, Gilbert West and Lord
Lyttleton, were determined to destroy the basis of the Christian faith. West
was going to demonstrate the fallacy of the resurrection and Lyttleton was
going to prove that Saul of Tarsus had never converted to Christianity. Both
men came to the opposite conclusion and became ardent followers of Jesus.
Lord Lyttleton writes: "The conversion and apostleship of Saint Paul alone, duly considered, was of itself a demonstration sufficient to prove Christianity to be a Divine Revelation." 19/467 He concludes that if Paul's twenty-five years of suffering and service for Christ were a reality, then his conversion was true, for everything he did began with that sudden change. And if his conversion was true, Jesus Christ rose from the dead, for everything Paul was and did he attributed to the sight of the risen Christ.
Top of page
Print this
A Ready Defense Index
Note: This text material represents only a limited
portion of the book pertaining to this issue
and it is Copyright © 1972 by Josh McDowell. All Rights Reserved.
Modifications can not be made to this material without the express written permission
of the rights holder.
To obtain the complete work, along with other pertinent resources, you may
order
A Ready Defense from Amazon.com
![]()
ARD-1.1-ENG-0009 - 30-May-2002
Privacy Policy |
Terms
of Use | Link to Us |
Contact Us
© 2006 Global Media Outreach. All Rights Reserved.