Reasons Skeptics should consider Christianity


What are the assumptions of Darwinian evolution?

Home

What does "The Bible is inspired" mean?

To what extent is the Bible inspired?

How could fallible men produce an infallible Bible?

Since Jesus was human, was He not also fallible?

How do you know that the writings of the Apostle Paul were inspired?

How did Jesus view the Old Testament?

Didn't Jesus accomodate His teachings to the beliefs of His day?

Is everything in the Bible to be taken literally?

Many interpret the Bible allegorically. Why do you inerpret it literally?

Which version of the Bible should I use?

A precaution as a basis for belief

Is the solar system really 4.5 billion years old?

Is there evidence of instantaneous creation?

Is there controversy in the history of the orgin of life?

Is there enough time?

Are probabilities against the chance formation of large biological molecules?

Mechanistic or materialistic universe?

Does evolution violate the second law of thermodynamics?

What are the assumptions of Darwinian evolution?

Are mutations advantageous?

Is the fossil record complete?

Are there transitional forms: creature to creature?

Are there transitions: form to form?

Is God unscientific?

Is fossilization evidence of a catastrophe?

Why don't more scientists accept creationism?

Print this page

Frings and Frings1 list six postulates of the Darwinian view of evolution.

First, Darwin assumed that there was a tendency for animals and plants to reproduce geometrically. By this he meant that a pair of animals had far more offspring than was necessary to replace themselves. A fish may lay millions of eggs in its lifetime. If each egg produced a full-grown adult, the population of that species would swell ominously in a short time.

Darwin's second postulate was that the number of individuals in a species remained relatively constant.

The third postulate was that since large numbers of the offspring failed to reach maturity, there was a struggle or competition for food and reproduction.

Darwin further assumed that there was variability between individuals and that the variability was unlimited.

The fifth assumption was that natural selection allowed only the "fittest" to survive.

Finally, Darwin assumed that the environment changed continuously so that the definition of what is "fittest" changed with time.

Darwin also believed that the process of change was gradual.
He stated,

"If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could not possibly have been formed by numerous successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down."2

Other writers, since, have departed from the gradual view of evolution and have embraced a more rapid cataclysmic view of how species evolve.
In the next few chapters we will examine these postulates and the speed with which evolution occurs.

NOTES

1. Frings and Frings, Concepts of Zoology, New York: McMillan, 1970, p. 53, 54.
2. Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species, New York: New American Library, 1958, p. 171.

  

Home What does "The Bible is inspired" mean? To what extent is the Bible inspired? How could fallible men produce an infallible Bible? Since Jesus was human, was He not also fallible? How do you know that the writings of the Apostle Paul were inspired? How did Jesus view the Old Testament? Didn't Jesus accomodate His teachings to the beliefs of His day? Is everything in the Bible to be taken literally? Many interpret the Bible allegorically. Why do you inerpret it literally? Which version of the Bible should I use? A precaution as a basis for belief Is the solar system really 4.5 billion years old? Is there evidence of instantaneous creation? Is there controversy in the history of the orgin of life? Is there enough time? Are probabilities against the chance formation of large biological molecules? Mechanistic or materialistic universe? Does evolution violate the second law of thermodynamics? What are the assumptions of Darwinian evolution? Are mutations advantageous? Is the fossil record complete? Are there transitional forms: creature to creature? Are there transitions: form to form? Is God unscientific? Is fossilization evidence of a catastrophe? Why don't more scientists accept creationism? Print this page

REASONS Why Skeptics Ought to Consider Christianity
by Josh McDowell and Don Stewart
A Campus Crusade for Christ Book

Published by
HERE'S LIFE PUBLISHERS, INC.
P. 0. Box 1576
San Bernardino, CA 92402

ISBN 0-918956-98-6
HLP Product No. 402818

Library of Congress Catalogue Card 80-67432 ©Copyright 1981 by Campus Crusade for Christ, Inc.


Reasons Skeptics should consider Christianity
RSSCC-1.0-ENG-0004

5/17/2002 3:00:04 PM

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Link to Us | Contact Us
© 2006 Global Media Outreach. All Rights Reserved.